Bad sex or wait?

This was the question posed:

If you had gone 6 months without SEX & you had the opportunity to have sex but knew it would be bad, would you do it, or wait for great sex?

Here are the responses... 

• If you've been out of practice for 6 months it's going to be bad sex no matter what you do :)
• I vote to make the sex better if it is bad!
• Better none than bad.
• I think I'd do it :) ...meaning choice for bad sex
• Just do it ...meaning choice for bad sex
• If it had ONLY been 6 months... I'd consider myself a lucky guy
• In a cocaine heartbeat. Bad sex is better than no sex.
• I'd think I'd wait.
• I'd do it. After six months, even bad sex is decent sex :)
• DO IT! :D ...meaning choice for bad sex
• I would do it ...meaning choice for bad sex
• People are actually having sex out there without inviting me to join in? How rude!
• Definitely wait
• 6 months? I'd stick it down a mud hole!
• Could I have both? Pretty please! ;-)
• I'd probably try to wait and break down quickly.
• Hold out for great sex :) Heck, I've waited that long, I can wait a little longer.
• Um... I haven't had sex in over 7 years... so I guess my answer would have to be that I would definitely wait. *shrugs*
• No sex is probably better than bad sex. At least you can have good sex by yourself if you get creative, no? ;)
• Hold out, no question
• I'd wait for good sex at that point- cause great sex doesn't just happen. :)
• 6 months? Don't wait, that's just fking painful

My answer... I would most certainly wait. Bad sex is almost a tease, leaving you unfilled, messy and most always finishing the task by yourself... might as well wait and focus all my energy on mind blowing sex.